Hollywood Wins – Grokster Loses

June 27, 2005

Politics, Technology

“One who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright … is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties using the device, regardless of the device’s lawful uses,” Justice David Souter wrote.

And with those words, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned a lower court ruling and gave Hollywood a significant victory in its fight against illegal distribution of copyrighted material.

And now, the Court will have to define the term “promoting its use to infringe copyright.” But for now, it is clear that Grokster was promoting infringement. I wonder how broadly this will be interpreted by lower courts.

Round 1 goes to Hollywood. But will they be able to swing this stick very broadly? More to follow…

-CyclingRoo-

Advertisements

Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s